In CxD#164 I shared a podcast with Sam Harris in which he attempts to argue for a clear-eyed view of police violence and social unrest as a consequence of the George Floyd murder and protests.
I have similar issues with Sam Harris, or, in general, people who want to win arguments rather than to explore. Isn't his argument basically advocating being colorblind? It seems that it would be best to be somewhere between seeing only color and not seeing color.
I have similar issues with Sam Harris, or, in general, people who want to win arguments rather than to explore. Isn't his argument basically advocating being colorblind? It seems that it would be best to be somewhere between seeing only color and not seeing color.